Ukrainian echoes in F. Chopin's songs
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the Ukrainian-Lithuanian core of the Biedermeier lines of F. Chopin's heritage with a focus on his Songs, which objectively represented a significant component of the achievements of his compositional genius. The research methodology is based on the intonation approach of the Asafiev school in Ukraine and China, which focuses on the common genesis of human musical and speech culture and has been developed in the works of leading Ukrainian scholars, including those of D. Androsova, L. Horelik, O. Markova, O. Muravska, Chinese scholars Liu Binqiang, Ma Wei and many other specialists. The scientific novelty of the work is manifested in the originality of the perspective of cognition of F. Chopin's heritage in the organic reliance of the latter on Ukrainian and Lithuanian sources in the line of A. Mickiewicz's "Lithuanianness", as well as in the fact that for the first time a musicological analysis of the symbolism and semantics of the composer's songs, which he wrote from 1829 to 1847, that is, throughout his creative life, is presented. Conclusions. F. Chopin’s songs declare an essential aspect of the embodiment of the "thoughtfulness" (according to I. Belza) of Chopin's heritage, since they implement the highly artistic European "provincialism" that leads, through the discoveries of J. Lenz and M. Gogol, to verism as a powerful trend in European and world art. The Lithuanian-Ukrainian components of "Sarmatism", which nourished the creative discoveries of F. Chopin's entourage in the persons of A. Mickiewicz, S. Witwizki, B. Zalesski and other artists, promoted independent lines of the composer's artistic development. They differed from his Biedermeier performance and Mazurka culture, as well as from the romantic and protosymbolist achievements that dominate the composer's major forms. F. Chopin's songs constitute a line of creative searches, undervalued by both the author himself and art historians of pro-romantic inclination, which are in the direction of realistic and verist principles – the latter were, apparently, unexpected for the author himself, who did not dare to publish miniatures during his lifetime, which he wrote throughout his life
Keywords
Suggested citation
Copy citationReferences
Show all references[1] Androsova, D.V. (2014). Symbolism and pоlyklavier type in piano performance art XX century. Odessa: Astroprint.
[2] Belza, I. (1968). Chopin. Moscow: Nauka.
[3] Demska-Trenbach, M. (2020). At the crossroads of European culture. Aesthetic ideas and passions of Ludomyr Mikhail Rogovsky. In Transformation of musical education and culture: Tradition and modernity. Problems of generations and their cultural and artistic embodiments. Materials of the international scientific and creative internet conference (pp. 81-90). Odesa: Astroprint.
[4] Zаlessкі, B. (2023). Retrieved from granat.wiki/enc/z/zalesskiybogdan.
[5] Liu, B. (2014). Music-history parallels of the development of the art to China and Europe. Odessa: Astroprint.
[6] Markova, E. (2012). The problem of music culturology. Odessa: Astroprint.
[7] Podobas, I. (2013). Mazurkas by Chopin in context of Warshawa biedermeier. (Candidate dissertation, Odesa, Odessa National musical academy name after A.V.Nezhdanova).
[8] Vіtvіcкі, S. (2023). Retrieved from Wikipedia,org/wiki/Стефан_Вітвіцьки.
[9] Chomiński, J. (1978). Chopin. Kraków: PWM.
[10] Kämper, D. (1987). Die Klaviersonate nach Beethoven. Von Schubert bis Skrjabin. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
[11] Lissa, Z. (1970). Studia nad twórczością Fryderika Chopina. Kraków: PWM.